Hands-Free,Devices,Reduce,Acci law Do Hands-Free Devices Reduce Accidents? The Verdict Is Still
When you work with an attorney, you will have no problem reducing the risks associated with getting your case in front of a judge and jury, or other formal court, when you need to. However, every case is different. It is important to work wi Bankruptcy is a situation, wherein an individual is termed as unable to discharge all the debts. When a person or a company is not able to pay off its creditors, it has an obligation to file a bankruptcy suit. In fact, a bankruptcy suit is a
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-priority:99;mso-style-qformat:yes;mso-style-parent:"";mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;mso-para-margin:0in;mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}In a nation resistant to mountingevidence that gabbing on cell phones while driving is deadly, bans on hand-heldcell phones are often introduced as stop-gap measures. Such was the case inCalifornia, where a hands-free law took effect on July 1, 2008.But hands-free laws may be illusory,with a recent study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's HighwayLoss Data Institute (HLDI) concluding that the California law had no measurableimpact on crash incidence in that state.HLDI compared the number of monthlycollision claims per 100 insured vehicle years for vehicles up to 3 years old,over a several-month span capturing the time just before and just after passageof the California hands-free law. HLDI used the same methodology to weigh theeffect of similar laws in New York, Connecticut and Washington, D.C.The study did not directly evaluatethe impact of cell phone use because the insurance reports did not indicatewhether or not drivers engaged in phone conversation during the crash. InsteadHLDI relied upon other studies concluding that driver use of cell phonesdecreases substantially after hand-held laws take effect.A recent study by the University ofIllinois focusing on New York's hands-free cell phone law reached the oppositeconclusion, observing reductions in fatalities in 46 of 62 counties studied, 10at a statistically significant level. Differences in study methodology mayaccount for the two studies' opposing conclusions. The Illinois study reliedupon public data rather than insurance industry data.Assuming that the HLDI study resultsstand the test of time, they may highlight an inherent flaw in hands-free laws.Earlier studies have shown there is no appreciable difference between hand-heldand hands-free phones when it comes to crash rates. Those studies concludedthat the use of a cell phone while drivingwhether hands-free or hand-heldiseven more dangerous than drinking and driving.The primary reason, researchersposit, is that the human brain is incapable of attending to a conversation andthe road simultaneously. While in-vehicle conversation may distract the driver,it may not be as likely to cause carcrashes due to its countervailing quality of providing a second setof eyes on the road.
Hands-Free,Devices,Reduce,Acci