Non-Parents,Custody,Rights,aft law Non-Parents Custody Rights after Divorce
Bankruptcy is a situation, wherein an individual is termed as unable to discharge all the debts. When a person or a company is not able to pay off its creditors, it has an obligation to file a bankruptcy suit. In fact, a bankruptcy suit is a When you work with an attorney, you will have no problem reducing the risks associated with getting your case in front of a judge and jury, or other formal court, when you need to. However, every case is different. It is important to work wi
There are a large number of factors for a Louisiana family court to consider after divorce when they are contemplating awarding child custody and visitation rights to one or both parents. Many of those considerations stem from what is written in the Louisiana Civil Code. The Code possesses dozens of sections that describe the manner and methods for a court to come to a fair conclusion about what is in the best interests of the child.One of these interesting Code articles is article 136, and specifically 136(B) (2). Article 136(B) acknowledges that there may be extraordinary circumstances wherein a court will consider awarding a non-parent visitation rights subsequent to a divorce. The code uses the word extraordinary because it is hesitant to allow the courts to just give visitation rights to anyone. If someone other than the parent is to get legal visitation rights, there needs to be a compelling reason to effectuate that.Article 136 (B)(2) asks a question about the non-parent relative who is applying for visitation. Specially it asks whether the child is in need of guidance, enlightenment, or tutelage which can best be provided by the relative.Lets use for an example a child named Jack. Jacks mother and father divorce when Jack is 15. His father dies shortly thereafter. In a subsequent child custody hearing, the mother is granted sole custody of the child, and no one is awarded visitation rights. Now let us say that Jacks fathers father, his grandfather, wants to have some visitation rights for Jack. The grandfather believes that this would be in the best interests of Jack for a few different reasons. Number one, Jacks deceased father was a very avid outdoorsman, and it was a hobby that Jack himself had grown to love as he got older. Before Jacks father died, Jack and his grandfather went hunting and fishing at least once a month. Every time they went they stayed at Jacks grandfathers cabin in the woods. The three generations of father and son had many productive, loving, and positively developmental experiences together.A court very well may give Jacks grandfather some visitation rights in this scenario, even with no divorce because of the death of the grandfathers son. The grandfather clearly has been providing Jack with guidance and tutelage for Jacks young adult life. Furthermore, Jack and his grandfather share a family ritual that Jacks surviving parent, his mother, most likely does not share like Jacks father once did. Also, since a court has to always consider the best interests of the child it would have to consider the fact that Jack would not be able to as regularly pursue his hobbies of hunting and fishing if he is not allowed to go to his grandfathers cabin like he used to. Oftentimes arrangements like these can be worked out amicably without the courts involvement. For example, Jacks mother very well may like that Jack goes to spend time with his grandfather once a month. However, in the event that she does not, and she disallows Jack to even see his grandfather, than the grandfather may have a chance to overrule her determination as custodial parent, and his opportunity to do so would be in a Louisiana family court.This article is written with the sole intention of providing information. It is not legal advice. Will Beaumont practices divorce law in New Orleans, La.
Non-Parents,Custody,Rights,aft