Mandatory,Gun,Insurance,Hurts, law Mandatory Gun Insurance Hurts The Good Guys
When you work with an attorney, you will have no problem reducing the risks associated with getting your case in front of a judge and jury, or other formal court, when you need to. However, every case is different. It is important to work wi Bankruptcy is a situation, wherein an individual is termed as unable to discharge all the debts. When a person or a company is not able to pay off its creditors, it has an obligation to file a bankruptcy suit. In fact, a bankruptcy suit is a
0 0 1 269 1945 Wright State University 33 16 2198 14.0 Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-priority:99;mso-style-parent:"";mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;mso-para-margin-top:0in;mso-para-margin-right:0in;mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;mso-para-margin-left:0in;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Cambria;mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-language:JA;}Mandatory gun insurance,while no doubt a concept being promoted by the insurance industry (to makemoney) and the anti-gun folks (another way to limit firearm ownership) is justanother step down on the slippery slope that leads us to the loss of our gunrights.Just think, if gun insurancewas required, who would this impact the most? Why it would be the person whohad the least. It would disproportionately keep guns from the hands of thepoor. Think about a person who has little in terms of money. Perhaps thisperson has a minimum-wage job and can barely make ends meet. This person alsohas no criminal record whatsoever - not even a speeding ticket. Now theanti-gun folks want to force him to purchase insurance for his gun with whichhe has to defend what little he has?Whom are they insuring? The innocent? How many concealed carryholders suddenly turn criminal and start shooting innocent people? Not many atall. You see, the folks that go through the training and legally obtain theirconcealed handgun license and legally purchase firearms are not the bad guys.They do not go around shooting people. They do occasionally get to defendthemselves though. Why would we want to limit the ability of law-abiders todefend themselves from those who will not obey the law in the first place?The more people the anti-gun folks can keep from getting gunsnow, the more people who start to believe that possessing a gun isa privilege instead of a right. This will also create more people whobelieve that if they cannot have a gun, then nobody should have a gun.What about the argument that we are forced to have carinsurance? Fine. But nowhere in our constitution does it list owning anddriving a car as a right. It is a privilege. Nor does our Constitution adda part about insurance after the right of the people to keep and bear armsshall not be infringed.If mandatory gun insurance was required, what could be next?Crossbow insurance? Baseball bat insurance? Knife insurance? And at the veryend, fist insurance?Requiring gun insurance is just another way to keep guns fromthe hands of good people. Do you think this would stop the bad guys fromgetting and using guns? Not a chance.
Mandatory,Gun,Insurance,Hurts,