英国论坛
看到得多街拍的片子，很猎奇怎么能让大巷上的人赞成你拍他们的？是先拍再咨询意见仍是先咨询意见再拍仍是间接就拍。关于最初一种是不是属于偷拍呢？想听听摄影师和律师的看法。在百度和google上搜了一些，看来意见不一致啊。英国的规则是怎么样的呢？
百度
律师观念 :谨慎侵略别人肖像权
部份律师以为，得多摄影喜好者意识上有个误区，感觉只有没美化被拍者，没做商业用处，就不存在侵权行动。 实际上，假如仅仅是在公共场合偷拍不存在侵权，但只有是不通过当事人允许，拍摄特定的对象，并把偷拍照片发布传布，即使不是以营利为目的，除了用作旧事报导、公安机关为缉捕犯法嫌疑人而发的“通缉令”等状况外，就应看做是侵略了对方的肖像权。并且，在网站上公布这种照片，天然有吸引眼球、进步点击率、扩张网站影响的目的，很难说是非营利性的。照片一旦上网，难保被人恶搞或做非法之用，一旦这样就可能损害被拍者声誉权，拍摄者、公布者、网站和恶搞者均应承当相应责任。并且，街拍流动也不是很受市民的反对，得多穿戴时尚的俊男靓女在街上还不克不及安然面对生疏人的镜头，以至不少“街拍”都变为了“偷拍”。为此，为了避免侵略肖像权，街拍图片在网上公布时应把面部隐约掉，防止惹起相干法律纠纷。
following from http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/20十二/04/14/photographers-rights-the-ultimate-guide/
Photographers Rights: Taking Pictures of People in Public
Are you breaking any law when you’re taking pictures of people in public? Probably not, but the position under UK law is uncertain.
There are currently no general privacy laws under UK law, but the UK courts must take into account the European Convention on Human Rights, which gives everyone the right to respect for their private and family life. As this is an area of law that has been developing rapidly over the last few years, it is hard to be certain what will constitute an infringement.
The key issue is whether the place the image is taken is one where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy. For example, it has been suggested that the right of privacy of a child could be infringed by publishing a photo of them with their parents in a public street.
It is therefore advisable to be careful when taking photos intended for publication, even where the subject matter is in a public place. Failure to obtain a model release for the use of an image will certainly make it harder to sell the picture to stock libraries.
Photographing children
The same laws apply to adult and child subjects, but a child does not have the legal capacity to consent and a parent or guardian must therefore do so on their behalf. Be aware that schools, leisure centres and places where children and adults gather usually have their own photography restrictions.
Although decent photos of children (see our tips for better pictures of babies, children and teenagers) taken in a public place may be fine for non-co妹妹ercial use, seek permission from the child’s parents or guardians and don’t shoot covertly with a long lens. For co妹妹ercial images, you’ll need to get a model release signed by the parents.
回帖
拍小孩要征得小孩儿赞成，用长焦拍从里面拍他人家不行，好像就是这两条。
摆拍抓拍守株待兔都纷歧样的
回帖
你在英國居然查百度？
There is no law against photographing children
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/co妹妹ent/personal-view/3559975/There-is-no-law-against-photographing-children.html
回帖
街拍的时分被拍摄者有权让你删除照片,但只有作品没有广告商业用处,就不存在侵权.安心的玩儿吧:)
回帖
对方让你删除照片，你需求按照对方需要删除与对方相干的照片。其余的没无关系。
回帖
我也是一个街拍狂 很厚脸皮的那种 遇到得多不同反映的对象 有友善的 还在你背后拍pose 有问你是否拍他的 也有过叫你删除照片的
回帖
这个问题和“人类是不是不该该再使用照像机”同样。
只有在户外拍照片，即便拍景色，不免会拍到路人，生疏人，占画面大小区分罢了。
回帖
我是问过我之前一个学法律的学妹，假如你是成心拍对方的行动的，需求失掉对方的许可。 不然对方有法依据告你的，假如你拍的景色啊，或者一些流动不谨慎把人带进去的，没无关系。 这界定于你是目的是甚么。
回帖
回帖
我刚来英国时好些同窗在路上看到小敌人就拍，人家家长看起来都不是那末乐意:L
回帖
我假如拍肖像的话我会先问，个别人你嘴巴甜点不会回绝你的
回帖
要是我确定不快乐，万一很丑给拍进去了 咋办？并且个别爱街拍的都不大违心拍照（拍本人）！
回帖
假如你街拍没人禁止你，照片拍上去就是你的由于摄影师有copy right，然而有人要求你删除照片，你必需删除，不然他们有权起诉你。
此外，英国实际上是有禁拍令的，实践上一切的公共场合都阻止拍摄，需求拍照的话要跟政府请求许可。只不外当初管的对比松，然而要是较起真来仍是很容易惹费事的。
我5年前拍结业作品的时分，那些个许可老费事了。都是学校露面给我搞的，而后我拍片的时分四周4-5个保安大膀随着，整的我可欠好意思了。
回帖
回帖
[quote=“gaopeng9十一, post: 14, topic: 2568268”]
gaopeng9十一 颁发于 2014-十二-25 00:59
你是不知道几年前一次摄影师的个人抗议吧？过后那段时间对比敏感，在街上你把相机取出来都不必拍，就会有 …[/quote]
not quite right
wikipedia:
Following a prolonged campaign, including a series of demonstrations by photographers dealt with by Police Officers and PCSOs, the Metropolitan Police was forced to issue updated legal advice which now confirms that ‘Members of the public and the media do not need a permit to film or photograph in public places and police have no power to stop them filming or photographing incidents or police personnel’ and that ‘The power to stop and search someone under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 no longer exists.’
回帖
回帖
回帖
英国不知道，美国这边是在public场合，photographer能够拍任何你想拍的包罗小孩。
没人有权益让你删除照片。固然要publish，做商业用处之类就需求model release
回帖
回帖