英国论坛
根据Guardian，Theresa May对于经济方面的得多症结经济政策理念是工党和右翼的，乃至有人还说就是从工党上次大选宣言里抄的，假如激进党占据中右的同时向中左进发，不知道工党还能够玩甚么，看起来只要John McDonnell的极左能够玩了。
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2016/jul/十一/andrea-leadsom-apologises-to-theresa-may-politics-live?page=with:block-5783b3b4e4b0f36a6e1c5521#block-5783b3b4e4b0f36a6e1c5521
But the real interest in the speech lay in what it revealed about her thinking. Based on this text, it would be reasonable to assume that the May has lifted many of her ideas from four prominent leftwingers.
1 - The ‘Gordon Brown’ Theresa May
When Gordon Brown was chancellor he talked endlessly about the need to improve productivity. George Osborne says much less about this, but this passage sounded as if it could have been delivered by New Labour’s iron chancellor.
“Yet we have long had a problem with productivity in Britain. So I want to make its improvement an important objective for the Treasury. I want to see an energy policy that emphasises the reliability of supply and lower costs for users. A better research and development policy that helps firms to make the right investment decisions. More Treasury-backed project bonds for new infrastructure projects. More house building. A proper industrial strategy to get the whole economy firing. And a plan to help not one or even two of our great regional cities but every single one of them.”
The sentence about Treasury-backed project bonds for infrastructure could have been drafted by Ken Livingstone, who has backed similar ideas for years. (It is also worth noting that this paragraph contains a minor swipe at George Osborne and his Northern Powerhouse plan; the government should be helping all big cities, not just Manchester, she is saying.)
2 - The ‘Will Hutton’ Theresa May
Younger readers may not remember “stakeholder capitalism”, a notion championed by the journalist and writer Will Hutton, but for about five minutes it was Tony Blair’s favourite philosophy, and May revived it in her speech. She said:
“[i]If we are going to have an economy that works for everyone, we are going to need to give people more control of their lives. And that means cutting out all the political platitudes about “stakeholder societies” - and doing something radical.
Because as we saw when Cadbury’s - that great Birmingham company - was bought by Kraft, or when AstraZeneca was almost sold to Pfizer, transient shareholders - who are mostly companies investing other people’s money - are not the only people with an interest when firms are sold or close. Workers have a stake, local co妹妹unities have a stake, and often the whole country has a stake. It is hard to think of an industry of greater strategic importance to Britain than its pharmaceutical industry, and AstraZeneca is one of the jewels in its crown. Yet two years ago the Government almost allowed AstraZeneca to be sold to Pfizer, the US company with a track record of asset stripping and whose self-confessed attraction to the deal was to avoid tax. A proper industrial strategy wouldn’t automatically stop the sale of British firms to foreign ones, but it should be capable of stepping in to defend a sector that is as important as pharmaceuticals is to Britain.[/i]”
3 - The ‘Ed Miliband’ Theresa May
As Labour leader Ed Miliband promised to take on “vested interests”. May made a very similar promise today - while claiming that in doing so she was acting in accordance with Tory tradition.
From Robert Peel to Lady Thatcher, from Joseph Chamberlain to Winston Churchill, throughout history it has been the Conservative party’s role to rise to the occasion and to take on the vested interests before us, to break up power when it is concentrated among the few, to lead on behalf of the people.
More significantly, May announced several policy proposals that were pure Miliband. As reported overnight, she called for workers to be represented on company boards (going slightly further than Labour did in its 2015 manifesto). She also called for action on excessive executive pay and on cartels.
“A[i]s part of the changes I want to make to corporate governance, I want to make shareholder votes on corporate pay not just advisory but binding. I want to see more transparency, including the full disclosure of bonus targets and the publication of “pay multiple” data: that is, the ratio between the CEO’s pay and the average company worker’s pay. And I want to simplify the way bonuses are paid so that the bosses’ incentives are better aligned with the long-term interests of the company and its shareholders.
I also want us to be prepared to use - and reform - competition law so that markets work better for people. If there is evidence that the big utility firms and the retail banks are abusing their roles in highly-consolidated markets, we shouldn’t just complain about it, we shouldn’t say it’s too difficult, we should do something about it.[/i]”
Miliband also draw up plans to stop banks and energy companies exploiting consumers. Two of his most senior advisers - the Labour peer Stewart Wood, who advised Miliband on policy, and Tom Baldwin, Miliband’s co妹妹unications chief - have accused May of plagiarism.
4 - The ‘Elizabeth Warren’ Theresa May
May also seems to have taken inspiration from Elizabeth Warren, the US Democratic senator, who delivered this much-quoted speech five years ago.
And here is May’s version.
“And tax. We need to talk about tax. Because we’re Conservatives, and of course we believe in a low-tax economy, in which British businesses are more competitive and families get to keep more of what they earn - but we also understand that tax is the price we pay for living in a civilised society. No individual and no business, however rich, has succeeded all on their own. Their goods are transported by road, their workers are educated in schools, their customers are part of sophisticated networks taking in the private sector, the public sector and charities. It doesn’t matter to me whether you’re Amazon, Google or Starbucks, you have a duty to put something back, you have a debt to your fellow citizens, you have a responsibility to pay your taxes. So as Prime Minister, I will crack down on individual and corporate tax avoidance and evasion.”
回帖
工党玩分裂啊，而后再拿小红本玩共产主义
回帖
我仍是挺看好她的，贫富迥异确定惹起社会问题，趁当初问题还在能够管制规模以内均衡这个问题十分有须要。 过大的金融行业会惹起更大的泡沫，德银跟意大利银行都是很好的例子。 我本人自身是金融业然而我是反对退欧的，由于在现有体制下好的资源只会在社会顶层为顶层人士办事，这会形成资源挥霍。 农产品，石油，大宗商品曾经在被赋与金融属性当前曾经失去了自身的属性，价钱把持在投行手里，不论怎样也会失控。 只要商品办事跟休息力资源回归自身的价值，才是一个安康的产业链。
回帖
They play soft play
回帖
目前的英国情势，自在"极端"的政策 能力扭转场面。假如政策忽左忽右，动荡时间会更长。固然不论甚么政策，她都有可能当选上来。这个首相可不是那末好当的
回帖
回帖
这些理念挺不错的，这是替可能提前到来的大选拉选票吗?
不知道能不克不及真实的实行上来，觉得May姨妈的方略和Cameron&Osborn不是一条路子啊，这样动荡敏感的时代她不怕把资同族赶跑了吗？
回帖
我觉的很好啊~ 这样激进党就成为了工党了
到时分天然会有别的甚么党来制衡的了~~~
回帖
回帖
话说May姨妈的长相真实是。。。女生男相
回帖
回帖
转载 ■■■■■■ 网友
发信人: ElectricBro (Peace de Wars), 信区: USANews
标 题: 英国左派卡梅伦 - 潜在变革 退欧胜利 完善谢幕
发信站: BBS ■■■■站 (Mon Jul 十一 17:28:36 2016, 美东)
http://www.■■■■■■.com/article_t/USANews/31997157.html
英国左派卡梅伦 - 潜在变革 退欧胜利 完善谢幕
硬手腕变革，大刀砍福利，消减企业税，引海内资本，待业率进步，市场复活气。
欧盟议会压抑英国立法，欧盟大陆来的不法移民遣返碰壁，不法移民福利欺骗，拉低底
层工人支出程度，英国激进党奇妙地把砍福利酿成的社会情绪转嫁给不法移民和欧盟议
会。
在退欧问题上，女王唱红脸，卡梅伦唱黑脸，所以激进派获取少量传统右派的反对，退
欧胜利。激进派卡梅伦坚定否认二次投票，他福利消减变革见功效，经济复苏，实现使
命，完善谢幕。
推激进派Therasa May上任首相，May大娘在退欧问题始终不温不火给本人留足够的台阶
和政治曲折空间。上任后，开脱欧盟英国从新国度定位，持续履行卡梅伦的经济政策，
砍福利砍税。
英国是古代宪政的创造者，大市场小政府激进主义的始祖，也是民主体制下党派政治游
戏的巨匠。
大英万岁！
回帖
回帖
回帖
回帖
回帖
回帖
回帖
回帖