英国论坛
看红字!!!
恭喜YLONGK拿下十年,和我估量同样,果真十二月就抢先寄出,这阐明了你也耽心有变!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/uk-to-escape-punishment-for-jail-vote-ban-2218627.html
UK ‘to escape punishment’ for jail vote ban
By Neil Lancefield, PA
Friday, 18 February 20十一
Britain would escape serious punishment if the Government defies a court’s ruling against the UK blanket ban on prisoners voting, it was reported today.
The Times says a leaked document prepared for Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg shows that the European Court of Human Rights could only put “political rather than judicial” pressure on the UK.
Related articles
Last week MPs overwhelmingly backed the status quo with a 234 to 22 vote in the House of Co妹妹ons.
Despite Prime Minister David Cameron declaring that the idea of prisoners voting makes him “sick”, fears of compensation claims running into millions of pounds have prompted reform plans.
They would see some 28,000 inmates serving less than four years being given the vote, although there have been signs that ministers could row back from that position.
According to the newspaper the document contains submissions from government lawyers, who estimate that as many as 70-80,000 prisoners at any given time could claim compensation estimated at up to £143 million.
But they say that the Strasbourg court does not have the legal power to force the Government to pay out on those claims, and the UK would likely remain in the Council of Europe which monitors the implementation of human rights legislation.
“The direct sanctions for failure to comply with Strasbourg judgment are political rather than judicial,” the legal note says.
“We are not aware of any country that has been expelled from the Council for non-execution of a judgment,” it continues.
However The Times say the document goes on to warn that the UK would “lose international credibility” if it ignored the issue of human rights.
On Wednesday Mr Cameron said he was appalled that paedophiles and rapists must be allowed to apply to have their names removed from the sex offenders register, after the Supreme Court ruled it was a breach of offenders’ human rights to be put on the register for life with no review.
回帖
你既不懂英国的司法轨制， 英语又烂菜， 别在这里丢人现眼了。。。。。
回帖
ls一阵见血~{:5_142:}
回帖
LZ’s post is despicable.
However, he/she didn’t put down any words in English of his own, but copied and pasted from newspapers. #2, what do you mean?
回帖
找抽贴，顶
回帖
喊狼来了的孩子又来替中介赚呼喊来了。
首先uk，作为现在的次要策动者，不成能彻底分开EU也不克不及彻底分开Strasbourg court，不然其余国度都会效仿，全部东方的人权体系就会彻底倒台，这是在昨晚question time上资深tory Michael Heseltine说的，http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00yzjgh/Question_Time_17_02_20十一/ 第一个对于这方面的问题就探讨了18分钟。
其次，惹起争议的次要是prisoner vote和sex offender register两件，而不是所谓的十年神马的，而且这两件事估量也就是最能惹起争执患了，提出意见的人也就是但愿能让uk supreme court能在这种敏感问题上能和Strasbourg说不，平时看报的人都能发现普通老黎民在那两件事儿上的意见都不合重大，更何况是其余的。
再次，lib dems和labour确定不会赞成，连AV选举的变革，目前神马后果都欠好说，在prisoner vote上现任政府还有一年多的时间来提出一个折衷计划（好比轻微罪犯恢复投票权其余人照旧）就是拖也能拖个个把年，过几月这阵风就过来了。
最初，任何改变都会通过漫长的议会探讨而且还必需有house of lords经过才能够失效，这个时间单位多是以年为单位的，更何况是要试图更改曾经法律化的货色。蒲月份的对于AV的referendum能否胜利，投票率能否够尚不成知，关于人权的referendum方案，即便有，更是不知道还等几年十几年的说。
剩下的让ylongk来吧，倡议孩子不听话有时分该打就得打。。。。
回帖
回帖
64yw你是个甚么货色！这些等十年的抓到你，有你美观的。
要是真的拿不到，先拿你开刀再回国也不晚。
你会有报应的.
回帖
你真熬煎人。
回帖
反对2L
回帖
我咋感觉这个和十年不妨事啊。
回帖
64 真溅，谈话专不挑好的说。惹公愤！
回帖
今天估量又会来发帖子拿相似news来持续做文章，先打个预防针。
UK government to press for European Court reform
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-十二517926
回帖
大清早又被lz恶心到了。
做人要天职，说谎早晚有报应。
回帖
楼猪 2B， 鉴定终了！