英国论坛
EU court rejects child benefits challenge
这次脱欧看来是板上钉钉了
A challenge to the UK’s right to deny some EU migrants child benefit and child tax credits has been rejected by European judges.
The European Court of Justice said it was lawful for the UK to withhold benefits to migrants if they did not have the right to reside in the UK.
Such “unequal treatment” was justified on the basis of “protecting a member state’s finances”, it ruled.
Benefit curbs were a key plank of David Cameron’s EU renegotiations.
Following a long-running legal argument, the EU Court dismissed the European Co妹妹ission’s challenge to the UK’s right to restrict benefits to migrants who are “economically inactive” on the grounds that they did not have the right to live in the UK.
It concluded: “There is nothing to prevent the grant of social benefits to EU citizens who are not economically active being made subject to the requirement that those citizens fulfil the conditions for possessing a right to reside lawfully in the host member state.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36526158
回帖
委托这明明对英国政府是利好
回帖
英文欠好？
回帖
楼主的旧事反而证实了卡梅伦政府能干 ，本人的事还要欧盟做决断，这更坚决了民众退欧的信心{:5_142:}
image.jpg640×十一36 143 KB
回帖
回帖
Following a long-running legal argument, the EU Court dismissed the European Co妹妹ission’s challenge to the UK’s right to restrict benefits to migrants who are “economically inactive” on the grounds that they did not have the right to live in the UK.
It concluded: “There is nothing to prevent the grant of social benefits to EU citizens who are not economically active being made subject to the requirement that those citizens fulfil the conditions for possessing a right to reside lawfully in the host member state.”
对比厌恶读这些相似法律式又长又臭的段落，
不zhuangbility地说，读起来真累，还觉得读不分明的觉得
回帖
回帖
Boris Johnson连脸都不要了，他人想打他脸都打不着…
回帖
骗子卡梅伦的留欧派好有一比：狗掀门帘子，就指着嘴呢
回帖
楼主的意思大略是这样的challenge多此一举，明明本人国度说了算的事件居然还要看人神色
回帖
好象退欧当前想要跟欧盟谈自在贸易的时分就能不必看神色似的。。。。
回帖
回帖
回帖
回帖
莫非退欧当前，德国奔跑宝马奥迪公众保时捷 都撤出英国市场么？
回帖
回帖
回帖
回帖
回帖
